Twisted, incoherent rhetoric.

James Black collaboration:

Exopolitical discourse is more and more confuse and incoherent. Contradictions are not solutions.
Lies bring lies, a chain reaction.
Yes, but no...no but yes...
Probably is late for a nice little Cult. Also is late for a nice little science or pseudo-science.
But theso contradictions are not new in the EXOPOLITICAL environment.
IF there are contactees, and if ETs are nice and benevolent...THEN is NOT necessary to implore the GOV. for a Disclosure. This is ridiculous. The disclosure should come from the Aliens themselves, right?
Either this, or there is a conspiracy between Aliens and Gov. In that case both are Evil.
Read carefully the post below, and find some coherence if you can.




"Dr Michael Salla"

To:

prepare4contact@yahoogroups.com

Dear Jopnatan, I have to clarify that I am not reconsidering a zero tolerance policy for various forms of hate speech directed towards extraterrestrials. I am seeking the right balance of preventing such discourse on the forum, with the need to allow constructive dialogue and analysis of ET behaviors that fall into the category we mostly agree is negative. I'm trying to find the right language so that members are clear that we will not allow hate speech (i.e., demonizing and fearmongering) directed towards ET races by those whose experiences, prejudices blind them to countervailing ET behaviors, e.g., benevolent ET groups/races trying to assist humanity's evolution.

I have no interest in moderating the posts of those whose minds are made up about ETs as negative demonic beings out to enslave humanity. While some who takes such an approach, may sincerely believe this due to their experiences, others are part of a sustained psyop to demonize ETs in order to condition humanity to accept a contrived war against ET.

In order for the level of discourse on p4c to rise to a higher level, and to make it a more attractive forum for more sophisticated posters with knowledge/experienc es of positive ET groups, I have decided that it's best to have a policy of excluding hate speech. Finding the right language is the key. The current proposal on the table is to revise the current phrase "demonizing extraterrestrials" to "fearmongering and demonization of extraterrestrial races." If you have suggestions for the right language to exclude hate speech, then that would be helpful.

Aloha,

Michael S.