UFO, Conspiracy, CHAOS THEORY AND PRACTICE, Exopolitics,contactees,Horary Astrology and Extraterrestrial Contacts, Demons, Angels, Hoaxes, Ufology, ET Information,Disclosure and Cover-Up,contactees, forbidden science, Aliens,NWO,Illuminati,,abductions,weird facts,prophesies,Forteana, Alternative worlds,magick, doomsday, time-travel, , revelations, secrets
Friday, August 17, 2012
Dr. John Mack, Alien Abductions and Death.
The closest star, except our Sun, is so far away from Earth that travel between the two would take more than a human lifetime. The fact that it takes our Sun about 200 million years to revolve once around the Milky Way gives one a glimpse of the perspective we have to take of interstellar travel. We are 500 light-seconds from the sun. The next nearest star to Earth's sun (Alpha Centauri) is about 4 light-years away. That might sound close, but it is actually something like 24 trillion miles away. Even traveling at one million miles an hour, it would take more than 2,500 years to get there. (Or to come from there.) To get there in twenty-five years would require traveling at more than 100 million miles an hour for the entire trip.
Our spacecraft, Voyager travels at about 40,000 miles an hour and would take 70,000 years to get to Alpha Centauri.
Perhaps there are beings who can travel at very fast speeds and have the technology and the raw materials to build vessels that can travel at near the speed of light or greater. Have such beings come here to abduct people for some experiment?
The ET=abductions believers think that the answer is YES and some of these researchers suggest the following agenda:
The Aliens are breading hybrids and putting these hybrids between us, pure humans. This plan will end in the extraterrestrial control of our planet.
Harvard psychiatrist Dr. John Mack (1929-2004), wrote a couple of books about patients who claim to have been abducted by aliens. Many of Mack's patients had been referred to him by Hopkins a believer.)
Dr. Mack claimed that his psychiatric patients were not mentally ill and that he could think of no better explanation for their stories than that they were true. However, until this moment nobody produced any physical evidence that abductions have occurred, it seems more reasonable to believe that Dr. Mack and his patients were deluded. But there is something else.
Dr. Mack received a $200,000 advance for his first book on alien abductions. He won the support of Laurence Rockefeller who also funded Mack's non-profit research organization for four consecutive years at $250,000 per year.
So, if you believe in alien abductions your belief is base on faith. Same happens if you believe in angels or demons.
Let us recognize however, that Dr. John Mack was a brilliant activist against nuclear arsenals, and a Pulitzer Prize winner.
DR. JOHN MACK DEATH
On Monday, September 27, 2004 while in London to lecture at a T. E. Lawrence Society-sponsored conference, Mack was killed by a drunken driver heading west on Totteridge Lane. He was walking home alone, after a dinner with friends, when he was struck at 11:25 p.m. near the junction of Totteridge Lane and Longland Drive. He lost consciousness at the scene of the accident and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. The driver was arrested at the scene, and later entered a plea of guilty by careless driving whilst under the influence of alcohol. Mack's family requested leniency for the suspect in a letter to the Wood Green Crown Court. "Although this was a tragic event for our family," the letter reads, "we feel [the accused's] behavior was neither malicious nor intentional, and we have no ill will toward him since we learned of the circumstances of the collision."
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Dr.David Jacobs talks about the Alien Abductions Agenda.
Dr. David Jacobs explains what his decades of research have uncovered about alien abductions and what the goal of these activities may be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hc37Zf1oyU&feature=player_detailpage#t=63s
The pathological background of ex-doctor Richard Boylan
From: Jessica Preston <prestonjessica75@yahoo.com>
So, the State of California revoked his therapist's license, marriage family and child counseling license and clinical social worker license. His practice was shut down. That was back in 1995. So, why is he working with children, today, I ask, especially after being cited as encouraging young children to trust pedophiles?
Dr. Richard Boylan is a former California psychologist who had his state psychology license revoked back in 1995 over allegations of improper sexual interaction with female patients in his hot tub (hydro 'therapy'?). He still uses the title doctor, even though he is not legally licensed for mental therapy anymore.
From: James Black <fso2604@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:18 PM
Subject: ARREST OF RICHARD BOYLAN, then CATHOLIC PRIEST.
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/2011/07/arrest-of-father-richard-boylan-then.html
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 14:36:37 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 17:50:44 -0500
Subject: Re: FWD: Boylan defends Dr. Wolf from Friedman
From: Clarke Hathaway [clarkh@uswest.net]
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 22:26:15 -0700
- Legal Findings Against Richard Boylan: Licenses Revoked (PSY-10047)
- California Superior Court: Subsequent Ruling Against Boylan
- District Attorney Taggert: Boylan Brainwashes Patients
- Sacramento Union: Sexual Misconduct in Bizarre Psychologist Malpractice Suit
- Sacramento BEE: Boylan Abuses His Role as Therapist
- KCRA News: Negligence and Sexual Misconduct -- A Danger to Other Patients
- FOX 40 News: Case is About Gross Negligence, Not Extraterrestrials
- Hathaway: Former Member of Boylan's CE-IV UFO Cult Blows Whistle on "Father Boylan"
- Stewart: No Evidence to Support Boylan's "Government Harrassment" Ploy for Money, Support, and Sympathy from the UFO Community
- PRNewswire: Psychologist Boylan Encourages Young Children to Trust Paedophiles
- Feminist Alert: Psychologist Boylan Publicly Defames His Patients, Calling Them "Homely, Grossly Obese, Lesbian. Poor or Welfare-Dependent Substance Abusers"
- Lindemann's CNI News: Richard Boylan Stripped of Licenses
- UFOlogist Velez: Boylan is Raving Paranoid Lunatic
- Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D. - "Reptoid Hugger"
- A B:.B:. Plea For IUFO Sanity re: CIA Shill Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
- Boylan Banned from FIDO UFO, BAMA Echoes and EBK UFO List
- California Board of Psychology: Order Boylan License Revocation Report
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Fwd: OBAMA CHOSEN BY THE ARCHONS
From: <archons@nyms.net>
Date: Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:04 PM
Subject: OBAMA CHOSEN BY THE ARCHONS
To: twylight.rider@gmail.com
We took notice of this contradictory statement: The so called Lords of Light( which are not lords not Enlightened) choose President Barack Obama as their candidate for the next elections.
Since we, Archons choose Obama as our own candidate, it's possible that those L. of L. are learning something about how the Universe works.
Romney and Ryan are puppets of the Billionaires and the Churches.
They are against women-night-moon-stars-shadows-love. They are repressive and reactionary.
So, our candidate is Barack Obama; a left-handed gentleman who will bring a new era of contact and understanding.
pulvis et umbra sumus
Monday, August 13, 2012
Exopolitics, 2013 cataclysm and the Art of Baloney Detection.
| | Jul 27 | |||
| ||||
CARL SAGAN'S BALONEY DETECTION KIT
Based on the book The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan
The following are suggested as tools for testing arguments and detecting fallacious or fraudulent arguments:
- Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts
- Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.
- Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").
- Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.
- Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.
- Quantify, wherever possible.
- If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.
- "Occam's razor" - if there are two hypothesis that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.
- Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?
Additional issues are
- Conduct control experiments - especially "double blind" experiments where the person taking measurements is not aware of the test and control subjects.
- Check for confounding factors - separate the variables.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric
- Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
- Argument from "authority".
- Argument from adverse consequences (putting pressure on the decision maker by pointing out dire consequences of an "unfavourable" decision).
- Appeal to ignorance (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).
- Special pleading (typically referring to god's will).
- Begging the question (assuming an answer in the way the question is phrased).
- Observational selection (counting the hits and forgetting the misses).
- Statistics of small numbers (such as drawing conclusions from inadequate sample sizes).
- Misunderstanding the nature of statistics (President Eisenhower expressing astonishment and alarm on discovering that fully half of all Americans have below average intelligence!)
- Inconsistency (e.g. military expenditures based on worst case scenarios but scientific projections on environmental dangers thriftily ignored because they are not "proved").
- Non sequitur - "it does not follow" - the logic falls down.
- Post hoc, ergo propter hoc - "it happened after so it was caused by" - confusion of cause and effect.
- Meaningless question ("what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?).
- Excluded middle - considering only the two extremes in a range of possibilities (making the "other side" look worse than it really is).
- Short-term v. long-term - a subset of excluded middle ("why pursue fundamental science when we have so huge a budget deficit?").
- Slippery slope - a subset of excluded middle - unwarranted extrapolation of the effects (give an inch and they will take a mile).
- Confusion of correlation and causation.
- Straw man - caricaturing (or stereotyping) a position to make it easier to attack..
- Suppressed evidence or half-truths.
- Weasel words - for example, use of euphemisms for war such as "police action" to get around limitations on Presidential powers. "An important art of politicians is to find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the public"
Above all - read the book! (Sagan's book, of course,)