Friday, February 11, 2011

Amazing Secrets of the Greatest Contactees Revealed..!


It's easy but you must go for the rules.

First rule: absolutely anything people see in the sky IS ALWAYS a Star-Craft. In other words, have always extraterrestrial origin. Now (this is important,) if someone says that the flying thing is just a balloon or a plane, or Venus, the individual in question is a CIA operative, a cabal, a psyop, a debunker, well, you name it, but be aggressive, hostile. Attack the individual. Remember that there are no persons who think differently, but only enemies.
Keep in mind that you are fighting against a monstrous conspiracy, a shadow government and the whole scientific establishment. They spend billions of dollars denying what you say about the ET in the Internet.

However, it's possible that the "star craft" (UFO) is a clear hoax, and the media gives details about this. (Jerusalem Post.)

In that case, it's better to remain silent or to go on talking about the Cosmic Brothers agenda, and keeping your believers hopeful and expectant.
Find some other sighting and write as if the Alien Landing or the Disclosure will happen in hours or days.
Remember this: you know more than "them": (NASA Scientific establishment, governments, UN, etc. )
If someone asks how you learned so many things about the Cosmic Visitors, just smile, or tell him about your Close Encounter, or your telepathic communications with the ETs, or your visits to Mars Of course if the curious asks for evidences, attack him or her. (See above.)

Second Rule: Invent pseudo-events with big names like Galactic Exopolitical Multiversal Congress. Create the Galactic Diplomacy University. Remember that in the Internet things look always bigger.

A Couple of friends having a beer and talking about what John saw ten years ago while he was fishing, can become the  Interdisciplinary Congress about the Extraterrestrial Quarantine imposed by one hundred different ET races to our planet.
Frequently use the word "quantum". It always sounds fine. Do some google on stars and put funny names to your Aliens, something like Betelgeusians, Rigelians, Aldebarians or Bereniceans. Forget about distances. Do not care if the planet of your aliens is a billion years light  from our poor little Earth. Nobody will ask you how they came here.  (If someone does, just smile and move your head.)

Of course read what other Cosmic Preachers are doing. Learn from Raelians, Exopoliticians, Councilors of Earth, channelers and contactees.
And have confidence in what you say: you will always go wrong but the true believers will have Faith in what you say again and again, even if it never happens.


Fraternally
Tomas Scolarici
--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/




--
Blog

http://ufotabloid.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

About Exopolitics-by Tomas Scolarici

(this is a contribution sent by Tomas Scolarici)


I have nothing against Exopolitics.
There is no secret here, but we need two for tango. That’s the basic deconstructive contradiction, and because of this, Exopolitics deconstructs itself.
The existence of Exopolitics as a discipline, science, or whatever you want to call it, depends of, at least two sides, two parts willing to establish diplomatic relationships.
However, there are not such two sides, and more there is not even one side.
Let’s agree for a moment with the hypothesis of the extraterrestrial origin of the Unidentified Dynamic Entities, usually called UFOS.
Let’s believe that these gentlemen, or gentle…something, have been here for the last three of four thousand years, wasting their time and money and showing no interest in any diplomatic contact. In fact in any contact at all.
In our own side, the same is true: only people belonging the UFO subculture show any interest in contacting the Aliens.
Earth governments have enormous problems to solve, and probably they will not solve these at all.
Things are going bad here on Earth and neither the People, not the Governments have time for science fiction given as the real thing.
So, the big problem for Exopolitics is that they want diplomacy without diplomats, contacts without contactees and contactors.
Of course we can talk a lot, about Colonel Shadow, anonymous sources, personal private contacting experiences, whistleblowers without Evidences, and obscure “mystics”, but, honestly something more is needed.
Talking and writing is easy. After all, evidences are not needed at all.
Just watch the ufological environment. Each one has his /her own definition. So they fight: “my ET is better than your ET”; “my Pleiadeans are nicer than your Zetas.”
And one more word for those who dislike what I say here.
I can be what you want: cabal operative, a psyop, the Devil or a member of the Opus Dei but remember that these accusations DO NOT ANSWER the arguments.
The Ad Hominem Fallacy is precisely that: If you cannot deny what your opponent says, just attack him; call him names.
Fraternally
Tomas Scolarici

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Star Nations' new Emperor of Earth..!



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <star.nations@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:49 PM
Subject: Supreme Star Nations Council.
To: sadhanusari@gmail.com


Supreme Council of the Star Nations.

To whom it may concern.
Considering that the Councilor of Earth, Dr. Richard Boylan shows a  proper and correct knowledge of all the Political, Economical and Organizational demands, tribulations and solutions of and for the Planet called Earth;
We, the Supreme Council of the Star Nations, decided to nominate and proclaim the mentioned Boylan as Emperor of Earth.
Present day terrestrial and extraterrestrial authorities will recognize him as legitimate Emperor of Earth from this very moment.
This document has the whole Force of Law for Earth and for the whole Galaxy.
Given in this year 2011, at 6 days of the month of February, Terrestrial Calendar.
S.C.S.N.



--
Blog

http://ufotabloid.blogspot.com/

Group

http://groups.google.com/group/ufo-tabloid

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Exopolitricians : renewal of hostilities.

FOR THE RECORD, HERE IS MICHAEL SALLA'S RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE STATEMENT.

In my judgment, Salla continues to avoid responsibility by lying about his theft of intellectual property in 2003 using clever and snide remarks to do so, and has chose...n to reject settlement of this matter. It is common to direct persons to change incorrect details on your biography in Wikipedia, for example. In Light, Alfred Lambremont Webre, Vancouver, Feb, 5, 2011

"Richard, regarding the Wikipedia biographical entry concerning me, it is contrary to Wikipedia rules for the subject of a bio entry to alter it. I have no control over my Wikipedia entry, nor do I post on Wikipedia. As for who is responsible for formulating the concept of exopolitcs I have dealt at length with the historical development of exopolitics here:
http://exopoliticsjournal.com/Journal-vol-1-1-Salla.pdf

"The meaning I give to expolitics in terms of how the ET issue impacts on human political affairs has been widely adopted which is why Wikipedia authors and others attribute the term's origin to me. Webre's definition of exopolitics, like much of his work, is too controversial and marginal. When I first came across it in 2003, I didn't use it since it was way too premature to talk about relations between extraterrestrial civilizations when people are still debating evidence of ET life visiting Earth.

"As for Webre's claim that he holds the intellectual property rights and copyright of exopolitics, I have to conclude that he is launching a new career as a comedian. That's a good thing since we all need to laugh more in dealing with these disputes."

"Aloha

"Michael Salla"

Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | February 05, 2011 at 01:53 PM

Friday, February 4, 2011

Statement on Exopolitics and Michael Salla

Statement on Exopolitics and Michael Salla

I am very happy that Michael Salla has finally publicly owned up, and begun to realistically describe his contributions to Exopolitics, the science of relations among civilization in the mulit-verse.

His description of his work in Exopolitics at Mary Sutherland's BUFO is historically and legally correct:

"Michael Salla, PhD (Australia) is the founder of Exopolitics.org, a website launched with the online publication of a study paper, "The Need for Exopolitics." Dr Salla has held academic appointments in the United States (1996-2001), and the Department of Political Science, Australian National
University, Canberra, Australia (1994-96). He taught as an adjunct faculty member at George Washington University, Washington DC., in 2002. He is currently researching methods of Transformational Peace as a Researcher in Residence in the Center for Global Peace (2001-2003)
and directing the Center's Peace Ambassador Program which uses transformational peace techniques for individual self-empowerment. He has a PhD in Government from the University of Queensland, Australia, and an MA in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia.

"He is the author of The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American Century (Greenwood Press, 2002) and author/coeditor of three other books: Essays on Peace (Central Queensland University Press, 1995); Why the Cold War Ended (Greenwood Press, 1995); and Islamic Radicalism, Muslim
Nations and the West (1993). He has authored more than seventy articles, chapters, and book reviews on peace, ethnic conflict and conflict resolution. He has conducted research and fieldwork in
the ethnic conflicts in East Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka. He has organized a number of international workshops involving mid to high level participants from these conflicts.

"His inspiration for creating the Exopolitics web site comes from a lifelong interest in extraterrestrial related phenomena and from his professional experience that to adequately resolve international conflict one must always address the roots. Dealing with the extraterrestrial presence is essential for establishing global peace."

http://www.burlingtonnews.net/interviewsalla.html

To be in full compliance with historical and legal fact about the founding of Exopolitics, Michael Salla must now revise one statement in his current Wikipedia entry to conform with the above.

His Wikipedia states - as of Feb. 4, 2011 - "Exopolitics - The concept of Exopolitics was formulated by Michael Salla."

That statement is incorrect and represents a violation of intellectual property rights and copyright of Alfred LAmbremont Webre, JD, MEd who first formulated Exopolitics in his 2000 book Exopoplitics: A Decade of Contact, on which Dr. Salla based his January 20, 2003 paper, "The Nee for Exopolitics."

Revising this statement in Exopolitics is not too much to ask, now that Michael Salla has begun to set the historical and legal record straight.

Thank you,

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Attorney At Law
Exopolitics.com
Vancouver, BC
Feb. 4, 2011

Fwd: The evolution of Humanity



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <messages-humanity@nyms.net>
Date: Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:07 AM
Subject: The evolution of Humanity
To: sadhanusari@gmail.com


The evolution of Humanity is impossible under the present conditions.
Human culture is based on the priority given to the emotions.

The negative character of these emotions is not recognized, and because of this, Greed, Hate, Passion, Aggression, Desire are nourished by your emotional culture.

Love is good, you say, and Hate is bad. That's the inaccuracy, because Love is Hate and Hate is Love. The polarity is always active. Those who love their nation hate the alleged foe.
Those who hate the "wrong" beliefs of others, worship their own.
If you love your God, you hate the adversary, and that is perpetual war. Everybody believes he or she is right and the others wrong.

Greed is also justified by love of the family, the nation, the kingdom.
If you love your country you are justified in killing those supposed enemies of your motherland.

Let us tell you this: You cannot fight the symptoms if you don't fight the virus, and the name of the virus is EMOTIONS.

You cannot feel hate if you do not feel love. The opposite is also true.
You cannot be free if you are attached, and emotions are the source of all attachment.

Forget about Love and Hate, and find the rational balance between individuality and society.
If emotions must remain (which in the end is not necessary,) emotions must be kept
under the control of your Intelligence, of your Mind.

A word about representatives and cosmic preachers:  Nobody is authorized to speak in our name.
Those false representatives give you a fictitious and negative emotional message.
See the truth. Control the emotions and evolve.

Recognize who is your real enemy. Your Emotions are.
Listen carefully: when you understand this, it becomes self-evident, obvious.
Know that the price to pay, if you don't give up your emotional culture is the highest of all: self-destruction.
If you agree, share.


A.O.




--
Blog

http://ufotabloid.blogspot.com/

Group

http://groups.google.com/group/ufo-tabloid

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Fwd: UNIDENTIFIED DYNAMIC ENTITIES. (not UFO)




Frequently we become prisoners of our own words and definitions. An example of this was the "Flying Saucers", referred to the unidentified flying objects or (UFO.) The first highly publicized sighting by Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947, resulted in the creation of the term by U.S. newspapers.

This acronym however is not only automatically associated with the idea of UFO as Extraterrestrial crafts but in my view, is not a good definition.  

Norio Hayakawa reminds us that "The things we call unidentified flying objects are neither objects nor flying. 
They can materialize, as some reliable photographs seem to show, and they violate the laws of motion as we know them".
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

The so called flying objects, move and stop in the space in such a way that we cannot define these movements as flying at all.

Same happens with the word "objects" since we do not know if these entities are objects of something else.

I think it's time to change the UFO definition. Doing this we will open our minds to new possibilities.

Instead of "objects" let's try with "entities", and let's change the word "flying" by "Dynamic".

We have then a new definition: Unidentified Dynamic Entities. UDE.

The adoption of this new definition and acronym will, in my opinion, help us to remember what we know, and of course what we don't know about these UDE, ex-UFO.

 Tomas Scolarici

 

--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/




--
Blog

http://ufotabloid.blogspot.com/

Group

http://groups.google.com/group/ufo-tabloid